Premise
1- because the police suspect of a boy who may be was drunk, they should stop him before he made any accidents or trouble.
2- because the large number of accident with this kind of cars
while negotiating a sharp curve, the manufacturer has a responsibility.
3-because the boy driving out at 4 am on a school night and her mother doesn't ask about him.
Therefore, I recommend to the judge that the police are not guilty ,but
the manufacturer are guilty and the verdict should be 500,000 to mother.
very good premises and nice conclusion.
ReplyDeletegreat job but don't you think 500,000 is a lot of money ?
ReplyDeleteI think that you have good premises, but i don't see how you got your conclusion, and i don't agree its the manufacture fault, because this kind of accident can happen with any car at a sharp turn.
ReplyDeletemother doesn't deserve this 500,000 her responsibility to give her son a car with no manufacturing problems and if she did she has to warn her son about the problem.
ReplyDelete